What I’m thinking of is writing so that our character’s passionate moments really pop out. This is a bit of a hard one, in that what is the “right” amount is so subjective. I’ve heard everything from “less is more” to “have your characters stomping about and crying their heads off.”

And what I tend to be guilty of myself is not bringing out a character’s passion in a moment they should be feeling some strong emotions. Only on occasion have I had someone say I overdid it. And I’m sure because in part I’m a level-headed guy who rarely gets extremely angry, sad, or anything. When I do, watch out. It’s like Mt. St. Helen coming apart. But it takes a lot of pressure to blow that top off. So I think I tend to write my characters that way.

And therein may be part of my answer. The character. Every character we write should respond differently than another character. What I sometimes receive in crits is that this or that character should be hitting things, or ripping the place apart. I think that’s because that’s what that critiquer would do, whereas I would not. I would respond to such a situation differently. And I’ve been in a few as well.

But the key is to write what that character, with their history and traits, would do in such a situation. Let’s bring this from the abstract to the concrete.

The traditional scene, John enters the room to find his wife lying dead on the floor. His oldest son and daughter file in behind him. The father might be stunned and simply stand there, not believing his eyes, not wanting to acknowledge that what he’s seeing is true. The son, meanwhile, may bang his head on the door post and squeeze his eyes shut, tears welling up and falling to the floor. The girl might scream and throw herself over the dead body, weeping.

And if we threw more people in the room, we could have each one react differently, different levels of emotional reaction, and they would all be true to life, and realistic. But what happens is when a reader picks it up, if that specific reaction isn’t in their experience, they tend to say it isn’t believable. It isn’t believable that the dad would just stand there, stunned. They would never react that way and they don’t know anyone who would.

But I think we can toss aside the question of whether a specific reaction is realistic or not. I think most any reaction would be realistic. Even the girl who remains in denial, plays and makes jokes as if her mother’s body isn’t laying on the floor, is realistic. There are as many valid reactions as their are people.

However, we also have to acknowledge that we are writing fiction. We are attempting to tell a compelling story, which at times requires a “not realistic” approach. For instance, as I mentioned in the article on writing descriptions, how many people go through their day noticing all the descriptions you traditionally see in a novel? I seriously doubt anyone does. To be going through your day, thinking about the leaves waving the breeze, the smell of exhaust in traffic, hearing a train pass by, the colorful sign we pass everyday on our way to work, etc. What you see in a novel is totally unrealistic. Yet, to make the story work, we have to put that level of detail in there, even though the character wouldn’t likely notice 10% of that detail in real life.

As one author I read said, dialog in fiction is likewise unrealistic. Few of us go around speaking with each other in smooth, flowing sentences that are crisp and clear. Our conversations go something more like this: “Well, yeah, I see your point. Uh, sure. Where can we meet, how about Jerry’s? No, I forgot, I have an appointment at that time. How about ten instead of nine? You don’t like Jerry’s? Okay, let me think. Hum, well, we could try the Lucky Duck. Cool, well, how about we chat then. Yeah. I agree. See you later.”

Can you think of reading that for a whole novel? You’d die from boredom. Yet that’s the kind of stuff our days are filled with. Menial task, discussions, that would be borrring to watch or listen to. You don’t want to have realistic dialog in your novel! Oh, yes, you have to have a level of realism, but you don’t want it to be realistic to life. That would be boring.

The same thing applies here with emotions and conveying passion. The point isn’t to duplicate true life as close as possible. The point is to keep the reader entertained and involved in the story. And when you’re trying to write that emotional scene where your characters should be reacting to a horrific situation, for instance, you could realistically have a man stand in shock and not react immediately to such a scene, but that doesn’t create good drama. It doesn’t keep the reader gripped to the scene.  So I think while one has to be careful to not overdue it, there is a time and place for drama.

The problem with overdoing it is when the reaction doesn’t fit the situation. Then it’s seen as the author trying to generate emotions that the situation doesn’t call for.  So, for instance, if the man entered the room and found a sandwich on the floor, he might get angry that someone knocked his lunch on the floor, but if he ran in, grabbed the plate and smashed it against the window, kicked the chair across the room, and fell to the floor crying his head off, we’d be calling the for the white men to bring the straight jacket with them. They guy’s cracked.

But, in the end, you need to stay true to your character. If it is a Clint Eastwood type character, he probably will remain stoic and unmoved, even in the face of danger or what is otherwise an emotional scene for others. The character and story will guide on what is too much or not enough. This is one of those areas where it becomes a judgment call, and except for blatant over or under done moments, each author’s call will likely be right.

For those not familiar, the first chapter/short story in the novella, Infinite Realities, tells how Sisko gains the ring, which as the priest says, marries him to God much as Sampson’s hair created a vow between him and God. The ring Sisko gains in the mystical steam house enables him to be his “brother’s keeper” by helping others with his new abilities to heal and perform miracles. And like Sampson’s warning to never cut his hair, Sisko is told to never use the ring for his own benefit or it will become a curse instead of a blessing.

The words inscribed on the ring, which the priest reads, are the words of Christ, “It is more blessed to give, than to receive.” And as the story relates it, these words are inscribed in Hebrew on the ring. That’s why you see the Hebrew infinitive forms “to give” and “to receive” printed on the cover of Infinite Realities.

Early on when fellow writers critiqued that first story, someone mentioned the fact that Christ would have said those words in Aramaic or Greek, not likely Hebrew. And though it is entirely possible He could have said them originally in Hebrew, I agree, He probably used one of those two languages. Most likely Aramaic since that was the common tongue at that time in Israel. And I received that comment more than once from different people.

So, why did I use Hebrew? Did I have a reason? Oh yes! I did.

First, the practical consideration. Yes, it is unlikely Jesus used Hebrew when he said those words, and you won’t find them exactly like that in the Old Testament, so He wasn’t directly quoting Scripture. My response: and your point is…?

Think about the premise of the story here. Jesus isn’t talking, rather God inscribed those words on the ring for a reason. He could have used any language in the world. He might have used German, or Swahili. It could have been anything. Because Jesus originally said them in one particular language wouldn’t restrict God to use that one language, within the context of the story. So what language Jesus used initially has nothing to do with what language can be on that ring. Using a different one doesn’t violate any historical reality. And, need I remind you, this is after all, fiction.

“So, dear author,” I can hear you asking, “why did God use Hebrew to inscribe those words?”

Good question. Thanks for asking. In my mind, God chose Sisko to bear that ring. Hebrew is the language of God’s chosen people. By using Hebrew, it analogically and allegorically signifies that God chose Sisko to bear the ring and fulfill that mission.

Warning, a bit of a spoiler coming up on Transforming Realities, but I’ll be as general as I can to make the point.

Now, let’s take this a bit further. In my novel sequel, Transforming Realities, toward the end of the book one of the results for Sisko’s son being in the steam house is obtaining an ability, but it also causes him to be dependent upon his sister to both activate it and deactivate it. The first draft of that created some interesting reactions among those critiquing the story. Most didn’t like it because they felt it bound the poor lad against his will to the whims of his sister. I think nearly everyone who critiqued it didn’t like it.

I did a few things to lessen the negative affect on the reader, created a positive sense that Nathan liked this ability, and had a choice to accept it, though he couldn’t reject it without some consequences. And while that helped, I think the general consensus was an uneasy feeling that Kaylee had that much control over him.

But in the end, I left it that way, and it relates to the fact that God chose Sisko to wear the ring above. Because Sisko didn’t really have a choice either. God put the ring on him, and he couldn’t pull it off. God didn’t bother to stop and ask him if he wanted this mission. Yet this ring, as the priest said, married him to God’s will in this matter.

No one balked at that situation. Why? I think it’s because in Sisko’s case, he is bound to God. In Nathan’s case, he is bound to a human, his sister. And our reaction to that tends to run deep, especially in our individualistic society. We don’t want to be dependent upon anyone, and rugged individualism is most often seen as a good thing. To have someone be put under the control of another hits our image of independence right where it hurts. We would rather not be forced to deal with that.

Before someone accuses me otherwise, let me say I’m not excusing one’s responsibility to do for themselves what they can, and help out each other as often as we can. But the truth of the matter is that each of us is enslaved to another in one form or fashion, and according to the Bible, we are required to live out our lives by loving one another. And what is love but the total giving of ourselves for another person? Is it not enslaving ourselves to them? Is it not martyrdom of our lives to benefit another?

“But that’s a willing enslavement,” you might say. Hum, you think? Once you say “I do,” it’s supposed to be for life, and yet frequently isn’t. A boss tells you what to do and how to do it. You are forced to do so if you want to make enough money to live. You may not even do that out of love. And yet, all labor is a form of slavery. Some freer to come and go as they please, but you give hours of your life to benefit another so you can feed and put a roof over yourself and maybe a family. Circumstances put us at the mercy of others, whether it is cancer entrusting us to the wisdom of doctors, or an earthquake destroying all we have, and we are forced to seek out help to survive. We are even enslaved to our government, which most of us didn’t ask for, and required to pay taxes.

And do we need to go down through the pages of history and look at all the different forms of slavery? No, we cringe at the idea of another having authority over us. So much so that St. Paul’s words in Ephesians about wives and husbands still ruffles the feathers of many a church goer.

But the bottom line is that Christ said, “In as much as you do it to the least of these, you do it to Me.” And the least of these includes also the greatest of these, whether that is a rich boss, a overworked spouse, a screaming child, a beggar, or a dying friend. In as much as you show your love to these, you are enslaving yourself to Christ. I would even go so far as to say, that unless you are willing to be enslaved by another, you will fail to be a slave for Christ.

“But they might abuse me! Take advantage of me!” Yes, they might. Get out of destructive relationships if at all possible. Loving a person doesn’t mean enabling them to continue with behaviors that are destructive for their souls and those around them. Indeed, your enslavement to them demands you want what is best for them, which may be counter to what they say they want. But we are still called to love, to fulfill whatever the calling, ministry, or investment into each others lives that we are given the means and ability to do. For God has chosen it for us.

That’s why the inscription is written in Hebrew in my story. It’s because God chose Sisko. Sisko didn’t chose to bear the ring or become a miracle man. Just as Nathan didn’t chose to be bound to help his sister. But he did so out of love for her, and the “bond” turned from a “have to” to a “want to.” If we are not bound to another in some form or fashion, we don’t love Christ as we ought. And we would do well not to shy away from the mission God has given us, but embrace it with faith in our Master, even if that calling entails a human “master.”

The Duke’s Handmaid

ISBN: 978-0986451737

Have you ever read a book that refused to be pigeonholed? In some cases, that can be a negative, in that the author shoots all over the place and so hits nothing. In other cases, as we have here, the author creates her own unique story that accomplishes several things.

Is this a fantasy? Well, not really. Yes, it is a different world than our own. Yes, you’ll encounter some odd creatures, and a caste-like society where the author explores the different reactions from both sides of the servant/slave issue. And yet, once you’re in the story, it really doesn’t seem too different from our world. Difference circumstances, same issues and people. You’ll not find magic, elves, dwarfs, or dragons in this story. Not even hobbits. Instead, you’ll find some well developed characters.

Is it science fiction? Hum, it is set on another planet, with two suns. Yet, that’s about the extent of it. The society is less developed technology-wise than our own, still using horses for transportation. The feel is more Medieval.

Is it a romance? We’re getting warmer. There is a romance involved, but if you’re thinking boy meets girl, they fall in love, but encounter problems they overcome in the end, it’s not really a romance as such. Indeed, while the story is focused primarily on the relationship between Keedrina and the Duke, the servant-master relationship it is filtered through creates a very highly unusual romance story. Indeed, even knowing this, the ending is a bit of a surprise. It is a romance, but not the standard variety. It will challenge your assumptions on those grounds.

Is it an action/adventure? You could say that. Early on, there is action and difficult situations that must be dealt with. We come into the story after Keedrina has lost her family and she is the only surviving heir. The Duke quickly gathers a gang of town folk and they ride off to deal justice to the perpetrators. While there are big gaps where guys who want action will find scenes more focused on the romance angle than moving the story forward action-wise, you will find political intrigue, back-stabbing, and a conclusion that will keep you glued to the page till the end.

So, what do we have here? The story of a girl who loses everything, and willingly gives of herself to serve the man she loves. You have a story of amazing loyalty, convicting humility, and graceful love, despite the cruelties she faces.

Indeed, the book is more about her love than the Duke’s. He’s a man that causes revulsion one minute, and admiration the next. He can be extremely cruel to his enemies, but faithful and loyal to his friends and servants. He is a flawed man operating in a flawed culture. And yet, finds a woman in Keedrina that convicts him and changes him. Indeed, will not let him go.

While the book speaks of great violence and the depravity of the society, Ms. Hokstad delivers it in a PG-13 manner. She doesn’t gloss over evil, but neither does she wallow in it. The writing is easy to read and pulls you into the well-developed world. The characters are interesting and engaging.

A most unique story of loyalty that provides a stark contrast against the harsh realities of a slave society. Prepare to wince, cry, and laugh. Easily a recommended read from this reviewer.

Note: The publisher gave me a copy of this book to review.

Check it out: Why Publishers Run With the Crowd

Thanks, Mike, for the invite, and everyone go take a read.

Legendary Space Pilgrims reminded me of C. S. Lewis’ Space Trilogy along with a dose of his Chronicles of Narnia while firmly remaining its own unique science fiction story. If you like exploring, experiencing new places, along with a bit of an adventure, you’ll enjoy watching the two main characters, Mario and Caitlin, not only escape from their forced labor on the planet Monday, but do so guided by a voice Mario hears in his head. The voice leads them to several planets before they discover their ultimate mission.

I especially enjoyed the worlds explored by the characters, which are well developed as evidenced by a detailed history unfolding as the novel progresses. The images Ms. Bridges paints with her words activated my imagination and brought the story into the realm of the possible.

I also enjoyed watching the relationship between the two main characters develop. Though they had a history together, the mind-swipes used to control them caused it to be new each time. Once they escape, they learn to explore their relationship beyond the limits imposed by their former world, and they struggle learning to incorporate their new experiences with each other.

The constant presence of the voice provides another developing relationship that they work to understand and follow. As we often experience, they don’t always get it right but growth happens all the same as the voice guides them to fulfill their destiny.

Most questions that came to my mind found answers before the book ended. The few that didn’t are left for a sequel to finish out the story. Yet, I learned enough to satisfy and wet my appetite for the next book.

While there were some instances where I didn’t grasp the logic of the character’s actions, and a couple of times solutions appeared too conveniently, they didn’t distract me from the story or make the story itself implausible. Overall, I found it a fun ride and look forward to finding out how they accomplish their mission in the next sequel.

The story not only entertained me, it provided me with a sense of wonder, the diversity of God’s creation, our common struggle to do the right things, or know what the right thing is to do. And above all, that it’s often not about us, but about something bigger than ourselves. The character’s pilgrimage reflects our own in many ways, and through them we find hope for our own journeys.

Younger children will enjoy Legendary Space Pilgrims as well as the young adult audience it is targeted for. Adults will also find the story an interesting and fun read. If you like the books I mentioned at the top of this review, you’ll like this one. I recommend you obtain a copy and enjoy the journey. You won’t be the same by the end of it.

Any fears that Seabird and its sequels would end up mimicking The Chronicles of Narnia are dispelled with this first volume of Earthbow, by Sherry Thompson. Indeed, in feel and focus, this book departs from Seabird while still living in the rich universe created there.

First, while Seabird remained in Cara’s point of view the whole time, this book has several. The storyline is more complicated, with various threads spinning around each other. Some threads touch others, some tie together, others remain lose, waiting to be wrapped up in Volume 2. The reader sees and experiences more of the world, the culture, and the darkness than in Seabird.

Second, Cara doesn’t return for this story, rather her brother, Xander, is introduced into this world. And instead of experiencing Xander’s entrance into the world and his acceptance of his mission, we jump into the story two weeks after he’s been in the world, already carrying the Earthbow, and apparently ready to find out what he was sent there to do, and do it, though it’s obvious he isn’t ready.

Third, Xander, while the Outworlder, isn’t the central character or focus in this volume. Harone, a key character from Seabird, acts as Xander’s guide and we frequently find ourselves in his point of view, and realize he’s struggling with his own journey and growth as an Enchanter, facing the dark evil that he wrestles to fight back. Another thread follows Coris, serving an evil king influenced by the dark evil that is working to enslave the lands, and his ethical struggle both to do what is right in the face of possible death, and his struggle with faith in someone greater than himself. Many other characters interact or take the points of view, but relate to one of these two threads in one way or another. As a matter of fact, while Xander is an interesting character, in this volume he is upstaged by the rich and varied cast of characters. This volume isn’t as much his story as it is Harone’s and Coris’.

I admit, when I first dug into this book, I was expecting Seabird II, and it threw me a bit when I didn’t get that. But once past that realization, I found a greatly expanded and darker view of Narenta and the lands in this world. The characters are well drawn, complete with their own histories, flaws, and struggles. The silent enemy working behind the scenes, and those he controls, provide definite and constant tension as the story progresses. Earthbow, while in the Narenta world, is its own book. The feel is more like Lord of the Rings. Not so much in the plot, but in the scope of the story arc. The book takes on a more epic ambiance than Seabird contained.

But unlike Lord of the Rings, and more like The Chronicles of Narnia, the allegory runs deep. Alphesis still is present and guiding, but hidden. This makes the volume a great read for the non-Christian who may not bother with seeing allegorical relationships to Christian characters or principles, and simply enjoy the story for what it is: an engaging story any fantasy fan would love to sink their teeth into. At the same time, the Christian reader can read it and derive valid Christian thoughts and applications to their lives, if they wish. For either reader, they will find Earthbow a gem of a story.

The writing is well done, easy to follow most of the time. Sometimes the jumping around to different points of view takes some getting used too, and for my taste, happened too frequently in spots. Yet, it wasn’t so bad that it distracted me from the story. More like shifting gears on a manual transmission. Most of the shifts are established well enough and the reader will be able to keep up with who’s who and where they are. I also found many of the descriptions rich without being overbearing, and the action easy to follow.

One other note, mentioned above but bears pointing out: this is volume 1 of a two volume book. It contains books one and two. The second volume, yet to come out as of this writing, will have books three and four and an epilogue. Consequently, while there is a thread that is tied up and a climax to this book, there are also a lot of threads yet to be woven to a conclusion. I’m told that Xander will play a greater role in the next volume, and a lot of the story lines will be completed there, including Coris’. It’s your traditional middle book problem. You have to wait for the next one to get the ending.

That said, don’t wait for the next volume to come out to read this. I highly recommend this book. And though I rarely do this, I’ll give it five out of five stars. If the follow-up fails to deliver, that would be a shame. But I have every expectation that it will deliver. And I look forward to discovering how these stories conclude.

Disclaimer: This book was given to me by the author.

Take a moment to check it out. But before you do, give some thoughts to how you express your love for others in your life, whether it be family, wife, relatives, co-workers, or even your pet. Society might focus you one way, but it would miss the real point.

And that point is? Well, why not read it for yourself.

Thanks for reading!

Check it out and let me know what you think.

I wanted to state where I think Joe has it right, and well, maybe not so right.

First, where I do disagree is the issue of whether piracy of an ebook, digital music file, etc. is stealing or not. The bottom line is, of course it is. Plain and simple. Copyright means the author has the right to decide who can copy, that is, publish, his or her material. That right is given through a contract with the author granting those rights to a publisher. I’m the only one who can legally give permission for someone to make copies, i.e., publish, my material. Anyone who makes a copy of an ebook and delivers it to a third party for their use is publishing.

It matters not whether they are making money off of it. They are stealing my rights. I don’t think anyone can get past that point with honest integrety.

Now, the argument is that this is no different than if someone goes to the library and reads your book, or sells a used book to someone else. The author isn’t compensated for the exchange. Copyright law doesn’t deal in whether money is made in an exchange, it deals with who has the right to make copies of a work. Looking at a painting in a museum is not making a copy of that painting. Checking out a book in a library is not making a copy of a book. The author has already been compensated for that particular copy anyway (in most cases). Same for selling a used book.

Making a copy of an ebook without my express permission is a violation of the copyright law and is stealing my intellectual property. If a person gives away or sells that ebook and then deletes it off his or her hard drive, that’s akin to selling a used book. But to make a copy of a digital file is the same thing as if I went to the library and checked out someone’s book, scanned it, and then published it through a POD, or printed it on my printer and gave it to my mother to read. Whether I made money off of it or not, I would be stealing the author’s rights and work.

I say all that to say this: let’s drop this charade of trying to pretend this is not stealing. That argument is a dead-end street. It is all too clear that it is, and to claim it isn’t only makes your case weaker, not stronger.

What is all too true, however, is that fighting piracy is also a dead-end street. Let’s put it this way. For the author, what is going to make him more money? Writing and selling another book? Or paying a lawyer and spending the time hunting down and prosecuting ebook thieves? No brainer. The former. So bottom line, why waste your time?

This is highlighted by the fact that ebook piracy has little negative consequence for the author. Yes, that copy of your ebook out there represents someone getting a brand new, published copy of your book for zilch. So it is an illegal copy that you should have been paid for, or at least asked for. But nine times out of ten, that person wouldn’t have bought a copy of your book, ebook or paperback, ever. So what it does is spread your name around, people read your book who wouldn’t have. They find a new author they like, and they go buy your books on Amazon.

Word of mouth advertising is an author’s best friend. This is the best form of it, in that it is your mouth that is doing the talking. Authors like Cory Doctorow have shown that giving away free ebooks generally results in increased sales of paperbacks. So it’s not likely that the person getting an illegal copy of your ebook has lost you any money. Only in the rare case where someone wants your book, is about to buy it on Amazon when they stumble across a free ebook copy and forgo purchasing it. But what is more likely is (if you’ve written a good story), they will read it, enjoy it, and tell their friends about it, and they will go and purchase the book, or even many times that person will then purchase the hard copy so they can have it or buy it for gifts. In most cases, it is more likely that ebook piracy will benefit you financially than hurt you.

Case in point. When I bought a new computer a few years ago, it came with some default songs in the “My Music” folder. Not samples, but full songs. One song particularly made an impression not just on me, but on my whole family. It was “Older” by They Might Be Giants. I’d never heard of the group before that. But I quickly did a search, discovered they had done a ton of work since the 80s and still going strong. I purchased their “Flood” album from Amazon, and loved it. We’ve since purchased several more albums, and I have a slue of their music, most of it I’ve bought, some of it from songs they’ve given away for free. That one free mp3 song has made them a decent return not just on our own purchases, but anyone we’ve told them about and have done the same.

Financially it doesn’t make much sense to pursue prosecuting ebook piracy for the author. After all, think about it. Someone has stolen an ebook valued at $4.99-$9.99 and your going to spend how many dollars in lawyer fees making an example of this fella? And it won’t stop the rest. Why waste the money combating something that in many cases will benefit you financially? It’s like cutting off your foot because you can’t get rid of the wart on your toe.

So I agree with Joe’s basic point and premise. Don’t worry about ebook piracy. It in the long run, it is unlikely to hurt you, and for the author attempting to get his name out there, it is great marketing. Your time is better spent writing that next book so you can create a new revenue stream than spending money attacking your fans, as Cory Doctorow likes to point out.

But I do think it is stealing, and morally wrong. Let’s not attempt to justify it with arguments that avoid the point of copyright–who has the rights to make copies of something, and either sell them or give them away. The author by default has those rights, and can lease them to whoever. Anyone who makes a copy for a third party without the author’s approval is breaking the law, and stealing. Someone who sells a copy they have and they delete it from their hard drive isn’t breaking the law. Someone who checks out a book at a library isn’t breaking the law. Someone who hears it being read by someone who owns a copy isn’t breaking the law. But you do break the law when you copy an ebook, a digital song, or any copyrighted work, and then transfer that to someone else for their use.

That’s the law and you can’t get around it with rationalizations. And as you can see above, the argument about the pointlessness of trying to stop piracy can only be weakened by employing this line of reasoning, not strengthen it. There are enough reasons to warn authors to avoid that pitfall without trying to make an illegal activity “legal.”

What do you think? Am I off the mark?